| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Wow we actually finished CPS. Next is closure conversion, then codegen,
and then we should be able to run some end to end tests. Then we can
look at garbage collection, and from there continue building features
down the long road to self hosting.
|
|
I improved the abstraction in to-cps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why have void? We will just use #f.
|
|
Gone is toplevel. Now everyone lives in a library.
|
|
I'm realizing that I should have started with builtin-exit and
implemented the hard stuff later.
|
|
We're omitting libraries for now, and I'll add them in later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This makes everything a lot easier, as it handles nested loops
automatically. My brain wave was storing the returned values in a thunk.
|
|
It works! Sometimes it emits nested loops!
|
|
|
|
I also cleaned everything up a lot. Maybe there are still bugs because
the test coverage is awful, but for now I'm happy to be done.
|
|
Computing length each time is very unnecessary.
|
|
|
|
It works!! At least it passes all the test cases.
Next I will:
1. finish the builtins,
2. add a conversion to IR2 in continuation passing style,
3. add a compiler from IR2 to bytecode,
4. and add an option to the frontend compiler to generate a
standalone executable.
|
|
Committing it because it compiles. I have to write tests and debug
it still.
|
|
This makes the control flow more clear, and eliminates the need to scan
the pattern twice. It also makes it easier to add new forms by
consolidating the pattern logic in one procedure.
|
|
I was reading about the difference, and := does what you want more often
than not.
|
|
Before we were assuming keys could be compared with eqv?. But it seems
like that assumption isn't true when we want to hold identifiers in the
hash map.
|
|
|